***********
4. INTERVIEW: CHARLES KOCH
Wow. Somebody making sense on Fox news? I must be high. No wonder I only watch TV on vacation. Speed dialing through the hotel’s multilingual trash channels, paused on the only one in English, and there he was. Charles Koch. Never heard of him.
What made me stay on the channel longer than 3 seconds was that the mandatory bubbleheaded bleached blonde interviewer with the $5000 shoes was being very deferential and not interrupting this guest every 2 seconds the way most do, even though it took time for him to compose his thoughts. Hang on…
The man was making an inordinate amount of sense for someone being interviewed on a major news channel. Wow, who is this old guy in the Bermuda shorts, and why are they indulging him like this? Intriguing.
But then when the interviewer read a question off her Ipad about him being trashed by Obama and some bloviating senator, I was hooked. I’m paying attention now. Obama and corporate media taking the trouble to systematically demonize someone? – hmm, this might not be the usual scripted FOXwash.
As the blonde automaton would read him the questions, it was clear she didn’t understand the very dialog she was initiating, showing the requisite lack of affect of a TV newsreader. Then the figure $43 billion came up when she had to ask the vulgar question about his net worth that her handlers had put on the Ipad.
But Charles was unflappable and kind of shrugged it off, giving it the indifference it deserved. As if to say - you’ve got me here on national TV and this is the best question you can come up with – how much I’m worth? In case anybody forgot the calibre of a FOX newscast.
And then the Ipad reader tried to bait Charles further and get him to place himself in one of the pigeonholes that she and pop media are required to assign everyone – are you a liberal or conservative? Yawn. Because that leads to the next even more vulgar question - which candidate are you supporting…? Double yawn.
But Charles just sat there unoffended, answering these intentionally provocative and insulting questions very simply and matter of factly, like they were discussing the weather - No I don’t support a candidate right now. I’m not very much interested in politics because I don’t believe that’s where the solutions to today’s problems are going to come from. The Republicans seem to be headed for disaster at 70 miles per hour, and the Democrats at 100 mph….
He handled the pigeonhole question by describing himself as a classical liberal, which meant he was in favor of helping individuals learn to provide for their own needs and live the best life possible… something like that. Which unspooled her altogether, too confused now to figure out how she could twist it around to make him sound like he was a member of one team or other….
In over her head, she was left with only one response: read the next question.
So I guess all this meant that this guy was some famous conservative labeled and targeted by the pop narrative as being inappropriately unenthusiastic on entitlement type of issues, or on keeping the gates of American wide open to anyone bent on her destruction, or whatever.
Which would mean this guy’s life’s work would be completely overlooked by pop media, because non-Democrats are only allowed to exist in media as one static unchanging personality – whatever the label assigned him at the outset. He was that player on their chessboard till the end of time, no matter what.
Then they cut away a few times to a post production clip of the kewpie doll explaining what Koch was really saying, in case the geniuses tuning in could see just how they, as faithful Democrats or RINOs, should be offended. Or is it faithful liberals, I forget. The two party system, what a joke.
This was like a freshman in college evaluating a world class PhD instructor on her first day of college, and pointing out his shortcomings and inadequacies… moronic. Fox news is so insipidly formulaic. But to their credit at least they had the guy on and didn’t interrupt him.
Ultimately their ploy backfired on them however, because unlike them, Koch was genuinely articulate and clear minded about his life’s work and his philosophy of ethics. He actually stood for something with his life, and knew what that was.
Guess now I’ll have to read his book and find out what he’s really done.
But hey, we really can’t fault FOX too harshly – they followed up with a clip of Blue Oyster Cult playing to a crowd of about 75 people in a parking lot somewhere in New York City, displaying a level of musicianship all but banned now from network TV.
**************************************
5. GARDASIL UNDER GLOBAL ATTACK:
NEW DOCUMENTARY
Since it was first approved in 2007, HPV vaccine has always been surrounded by a flood of controversy. A vaccine for cancer? The scientific premise offered to justify the vaccine’s necessity is too far fetched to stand up to even the most casual scrutiny.
But since the vast majority of the population blindly accepts the accounts of their doctor regarding Gardasil, there is no scrutiny. Most are willing to make virtually any leap of faith in accepting new vaccines, in absence of any supportable science. Until something happens, that is: the daughter is permanently damaged.
Merck’s billion $ Gardasil has become a standard injection for 9 years now in the vaccine Schedules of the US, Asia, and Europe. for essential background information on the absence of verifiable science behind Gardasil, see HPV: The First Cancer Vaccine .
A new documentary just came out of Ireland, and it is most compelling. No parents should let their daughters be vaccinated with HPV vaccine without seeing this 45 minute reality check.
REGRET, an organization of outraged mothers in Ireland is now getting TV and radio coverage that is going viral. Over 150 of their daughters have been severely injured immediately following the Gardasil shot. They were the recent subject of a documentary that was made by a prestigious filmmaker called simply
TV3 HPV Documentary
If you have any 11 or 12 year olds, stop reading now and watch the whole thing - not even kidding.
It’s a compelling glimpse at a whole decade of Gardasil vaccine. What holds your interest is the story each of the girls is telling – it’s the same story, over and over. The mothers corroborate by telling their identical stories of rejection by doctors and politicians, who have all rotely recited the same predictable mantra/denial of any connection with vaccines. Paul Offit has several analogues in Ireland, every bit as condescending and serpentine.
Officials there are floating some flimsy rationales. They even invented 2 brand new syndromes to explain the condition of these injured girls: Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome, and Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, which were tailor-made to categorize these new cases.
And then they proceed to deny any possible connection with Gardasil, without the slightest new clinical testing to verify that.
Sound familiar?
The systematic blackout in world media excluding hundreds of documented injuries and reactions from Gardasil in countries all over the world demonstrates the raw power that a global monolith like Merck can exert. This control has not been enough however to silence the growing number of dramatic reactions and injuries among 12 years olds all over the world.
Organizing in several websites, the potential of this experimental injection can no longer be hidden.
To enhance the coverup, the Merck-funded Vaccine Confidence Project paid its top writer to write a creative essay floating the preposterous idea that these 150 Irish girls are the victims of an internationally contagious psychogenic illness, caused not by the vaccine but by the Internet!
This is more extreme than even Merck itself, who admits the possibility of such reactions to Gardasil in 2.3% of cases. Quite a substantial figure in light of the millions of doses that have been administered.
The author of this desperate fictional essay, Heidi Larsen, invented a new term in vaccine mythology: vaccine hesitant. This Orwellian term is meant to refer to anyone who has the audacity to doubt any of the scripted vaccine dogma propounded by any government health agencies. Psychogenic, and vaccine hesitant! Edward L Bernays will never die.
Many countries have formed organizations of parents with injured children who are demanding answers instead of slogans
– where is the science behind the vaccine, and stop pretending all these children were damaged by something else and not Gardasil. Spain, France, New Zealand, Japan, India, several countries in South America, have now joined Ireland and the US in the fight against being finessed by irresponsible government policies.
The common mantra used by all health agencies to answer these informed parents is that there is no causal link between the injuries and the vaccine, blah ,blah.
But despite the concerted efforts of health agencies in all those countries to refuse to fund even one study investigating the possibility of injury, such a claim is flatly untrue. Merck’s entry in the
PDR for Gardasil lists all such neurological effects and symptoms as possible consequences of the vaccine.
An article appeared last month that should be on the front page of every newspaper in the world. We make it a policy not to quote unsigned articles from websearches. But the Irish mothers group called Thinking Moms Revolution wrote the piece called
Is This the Beginning of the End for Gardasil. Very well documented summary and update of the global Gardasil picture.
If you have any young daughters, check it out. Take some responsibility.
**********************************************
6. VACCINE EXEMPTION UPDATE
WithSB277 coming into force, you won't be able to have an MD sign your philosophical exemption any more. But that's not until July of 2016 that it goes into effect, not Jan 1, as many schools are claiming.
Here's the proof: this
letter from the California Dept of Public Health stating exactly that: SB277 goes into effect July 2016
Read it!
So that means that legally any school right now must still accept the personal beliefs exemption form that has been in effect the past 3 years, as long as it is cosigned by an MD. Any school who refuses to accept such a form is in violation of the law.
The only real issue here is enforcement. Sacramento can pass any laws they want, but if the schools don't enforce them, the law has no teeth. This role of enforcer is being resented by many schools today, as it finally dawns on them that with California's new draconian vaccine laws, the schools have been involuntarily pressed into service as enforcer. Many schools refuse to do it, or simply ignore the law altogether.
Many schools are still accepting the old personal beliefs exemption that is only signed by the parent.
But other schools, run by the truly clueless, are pretending that SB277 is already in effect, and demanding that all children be vaccinated now, unless they are in possession of the golden passport: the medical exemption.
Still other schools have never even heard of medical exemptions and are illegally requiring all children to be vaccinated, without exemption.
So the informed parents of unvaccinated children have to fight vigilantly to maintain their child's pristine health, unpolluted by the whims of political maneuvering. Parents must know the above laws and immediately send out a certified letter to the Legal Department of any school who thinks they can make up their own laws.
See
Letters:
********************************************
7. New for 2015:
fourth edition of
Vaccination Is Not Immunization
Not a reprint of the third edition, which was recently sold out, but rather a complete re-write.
Here are some of the topics covered in the new edition:
- the fundamentals of the new measles marketing explosion
– why the 2014 Ebola hype came and went so quickly
– what happens when the federal government takes over vaccine research from actual scientists
- the new US schedule of 69 vaccines for kids
- evidence why 54% of US children already have a chronic disease
- reservoirs for disease: the vaccinated or the unvaccinated?
- motivated vaccine investors: Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg
- the science behind individual vaccines
- much more
210 pages, almost 300 references. Every fact verified, every statistic sourced. Open challenge for debate.
Vaccination Is Not Immunization - now in 6 languages
The most reliable vaccine resource for parents about to make the most important decision of the child’s life.
Excerpt from
Vaccination Is Not Immunization,
fourth edition:
"This fourth edition brings us up to date on events of the past year.
The number of vaccines mandated to US children today follows the exponential rise in global population. In 1974 when world population was at 4 billion, US children were being scheduled for less than 20 vaccines. With world population now at 7 billion, the recommended childhood vaccines in the US have more than tripled, with the current figure at 69.
Objective investigation finds little scientific justification for this alarming increase. No valid authorities are claiming that the health of American children, by any verifiable index, is anything but appalling, and declining still further. And no matter how they spin it, no one can prove that the increasing number of vaccines has slowed that overall decline one iota.
Making one’s way through the research in this field, one is continually struck by the endless errors, inconsistency, outright misrepresentation and sheer hubris found throughout the most prestigious sources of mainstream science, particularly in the publications and FAQs of the CDC, FDA, and NIH.
In so many instances, it seems clear that their prime objective may not always be presenting the truth, but offering a validation for their own position and power - the eternal raison d’etre of the career bureaucrat.
No child is born with an intact immune system. During the first 2 years of life the immune system is trying desperately to organize. Despite extravagant claims by the medical community, how that immune system is actually assembled by the body is still largely unknown. What is known for certain is that subjecting the infant’s immune environment to an array of manmade pathogens, preservatives, and adjuvants absolutely can have a detrimental effect on the formation of that child’s brain and nervous system. All scientists - including the vaccine manufacturers - admit as much.
If Nature itself has gone to such extraordinary lengths to protect the blood of the child from outside invasion, can we presume to do any less?
*************************
“The most provocative, well-researched, blood-boiling text EVER written on vaccines.. Dr Tim’s style mixing pure science and his relentless wit make this one of my FAVORITE reads of all time. read this book and you will want to start a revolution.” – Dr Bill DeMoss, Newport Beach
“This history of the vaccination industry is vastly more thorough than that taught in medical schools and decisively more balanced.” – David Ayoub, MD
“The only book more important than this one is the Bible.”
– Dr Tim Young
Vaccination Is Not Immunization
915.307.1055
Order Book
|