power, and utilities such as electrical providers have a natural monopoly, but all those entities are subject to strict government regulation. Online media has become such an important part of life that these few companies jointly control much of the information seen by the public. If Google and Facebook ban certain views as “offensive” they can silence the expression of those views and present a distorted view of reality to their audience. When Facebook made an adjustment to their algorithms this year, engagement in conservative and right-wing news sites dropped dramatically.(1) LiveAction has a petition to Twitter to stop banning life-affirming speech and ads as “offensive” and “inflammatory” (2). Washington has become aware of the problem, with some favoring strict regulation, and others wanting to break up the monopolies.(1) One article gave answers to the arguments heard in favor of Facebook, and brought up this comparison: “if 35 years ago, Ma Bell did what Facebook does now — took telephones away from those who express certain opinions — how could you possibly compete on the level playing field of ideas? How could you join the debate, effectively organize, etc.? You could not.”(3)
1. Doug Mainwaring, “Washington backlash brews as Google, Facebook bully conservatives on social media”, Life Site News, 3/28/18. https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/washington-backlash-brews-as-google-facebook-bully-conservatives-on-social
2.
LiveAction Petition to Twitter
3.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/22/nolte-arguments-breaking-facebook-not-hold-water/