The Terrence Crimmins Newsletter
Once a Month
|
|
|
Back to Writing
There is no major news to report, other than I am working on the Hamilton novel, more slowly than I'd like- too much 9 to 5 stuff to do- alas. At present, I'm writing about the Revolutionary War and Hamilton's interactions with Washington and his Generals. I welcome input on characters or areas of emphasis that readers are interested in. I should note that I have avoided listening to the mustic track from the Broadway show in order to do my own thing.
Quotes from Hollywood Icons
Intensity is so much more becoming in the young. -Joanne Woodward
The trouble with movies as a business is that it’s an art, and the trouble with movies as an art is that it’s a business. -Charlton Heston
Tragedy is close up; comedy, a long shot. -Buster Keaton
I feel like a survivor from an age that people no longer understand. I want to try to explain what the 1930s- the Golden Age of Hollywood- was truly like. People forget that America was such a different place then, not yet the dominant force in the world. -Olivia De Havilland
Be yourself. The world worships the original. -Ingrid Bergman
Generally, I tend to despise human behavior rather than human creatures. -Sidney Poitier
They can’t censor the gleam in my eye. -Charles Laughton |
|
|
Would Joseph Pulitzer Have Published the Pentagon Papers?
Meryl Streep and Tom Hanks’ movie,
The Post, raises important questions about the value of freedom of the press. What, we might ask, would Joseph Pulitzer have done? But unless a time machine is invented in the near future, of course, we are unable to answer this question definitively. There is an incident, however, in Pulitzer’s lengthy career as a newspaperman, with remarkable similarity to the Pentagon Papers, where he made a quite similar decision. This decision was a revelation Pulitzer’s New York Paper,
The World, made about President Theodore Roosevelt’s actions in regard to the Panama Canal. In that case, like the choice of the Washington Post regarding the Pentagon Papers, it involved an opposition paper versus aggressive American foreign policy.
Many books have been written about the building of the Panama Canal, which was such a convoluted affair that it does not merit an easy description. Pulitzer’s revelation had to do with the creation of the country of Panama, which was only a province of Columbia before the digging of the Canal. Theodore Roosevelt was a very aggressive President in regard to foreign policy, and did not exhibit a shy demeanor in regard to the Canal. He had previously forged an agreement with Columbia to dig the Canal, a project that the United States had taken over from France. Columbia, however, when the time came, reneged on their part of the agreement, demanding ten million more dollars than they had previously agreed to be paid. This raised the hackles of President Roosevelt so severely that he pretty much created a country, Panama, and engineered a revolution there to relieve the United States of paying any money to Columbia at all for the digging of the Canal. Pulitzer’s revelation was about the timing of the revolution, when warships carrying American troops were sent down to Panama to ensure the success of the coup- (remember that old term gunboat diplomacy?) and Pulitzer’s paper revealed the date of the revolution before it had even happened.
Roosevelt was just as furious at Pulitzer as he had been at Columbia, and tried to prosecute him for treason. The case went to the Supreme Court, and Pulitzer considered it a key case in regard to freedom of the press. Like the case of the Pentagon Papers and the Washington Post, Pulitzer felt that it would be unfair to the public for newspapers not have the right to criticize American foreign policy, just as Katharine Graham came to feel about the rights of the Washington Post.
(The cartoon shows Roosevelt contemptuously throwing shovelfuls of dirt onto Columbia while digging the canal.)
|
|
|
|
|
New Reviews of
Who was Joseph Pulitzer? |
|
|
A very interesting, Imaginative and informative tale of a man driven to success in excess and fame and fortune!
Who was Joseph Pulitzer -
I do not always agree with the flowing and all positive evaluations of most works posted to advertise - but I do - try to see both positive and negatives in any book.
So here we go. The title, the cover artwork of this book do not reach out and grab one or invite one to experience any mystical tale or knights quest or put one into a make believe adventure world, nor does it impart danger, thrills or any of that really exciting stuff that some other works do and that some people like. To be enticed or lured in with mystery and wild depictions of other worldly things.
However - what a powerhouse book, most of the way through about a pretty dynamically, driven, rags- to-riches man who reached for the brass ring in spite of the odds being against him. He caught that ring through hard work, fanatical self-will and tenacity and then after success had the ultimate fall from grace sort-of-speak as does everyone who ignores the reality and inevitability of "The Peter Principle".
In total he made many, many significant and substantial contributions to the whole of Mankind and America and the News World. But to the discerning reader he created as many problems as he solved and as with most tycoons and Robber Barons who go after Robber Barons he became what he despised and the author very succinctly even if subtly brings this into play in this tale, story, yarn half-truth and half-fiction semi-adventure.
It would seem he Pulitzer began his trek on good, firm, moral (if not religious) and justifiable footing and grounds. But he was driven to extremes, like only a few can be and was tenacious enough to succeed in his takeover of the news world and in his own mind. And was, or saw himself somewhat of a "Sir Lancelot" or a "Robin Hood" or better yet a sort of "John McClain" from one of those "Die Hard" movies - going above and beyond to fight the bad guys. Because he was "That kind of guy".
Joseph Pulitzer was a man on a mission, a man with a cause, a man who refused to spend one iota of his free time on nonsensical stuff and seemed truly at first dedicated to helping the downtrodden. He was full of conviction, dedication, efficiency, effectiveness and "Out of the Box" thinking and he put his entire mind, body and soul into achieving grandiose success in the defense of and for the common man or woman. And I found I had to agree with some of his early doings, and his goals, and his targeted actions and strategies.
But like all heroes (something I learned early on - to be careful of deciding about anyone - or attaching that title to mere mortal men and women) - I began to see his obsessed had gotten the better of him and his individual fight against what he called "Dragons" had become nothing more than a self-indulgent disillusioned excuse to hate just about everyone and everything not created by himself. Almost like Lucifer and why he suffered - his fall from grace. "If I am not God - Then to hell with everyone else!"
It was sad - but I became aware, later in the book, to my great disappointment, that he was becoming more, of a "Don Quixote" (fighting Wind Mills at every turn & calling them Dragons) - or maybe becoming a "Parallax" in the movie "Green Lantern" (who was consumed by the Yellow Emotion of Fear - Fighting and hating all that was good in the Green Lantern Corps). Pulitzer seemed to only look at a man or woman or person or entity with the smallest of tunnel versioned blinders and missed the world as it really is. And so looked on everyone but himself as a "Dragon".
He became, as do most fanatical do-good types who lose themselves on the backside of a once noble cause, quest or undertaking the tale becomes nothing more than "what he hated" and what he was "fighting against" ... which was everything and everyone. He actually became the competitors he had beaten when he knew who and what he was.
But he seemed too often in mid and later years to wander off his own path and was molded by life and circumstances and naivety and always wanting to win at any cost and his all consuming obsessions - into his own force of evil, condescension, abuse and intolerance and was so overtaken by his self-elitism and his self-righteous ego that ("Everyone - but ME - is Evil and a Dragon") and Joseph Pulitzer became just another sycophant being destroyed and broken by "The Monsters of his own ID"!
He destroyed himself, his family, his fame, his good works, his mission and his goals and became, no less of a political monster like many in today's press and media who have become almost evil because of their similar blinding hate of a person, personality or entity (their Dragon or Wind Mill - depending on your point of view). And their belief that they must destroy those they do not agree with. A free press is fine but people do not elect the press to run the country, or their state or their lives. A truth that all news moguls often lose in their quest for dominance.
I was stunned to find on page 194 that the Hearst Empire apparently began the climb down into the gutter to stand there with Pulitzer himself. With them both standing there looking like fools. "He stole his techniques from me", Pulitzer says. And they both used that unfortunate philosophy that News Organizations believe that "Truth and Reason - Take a Back Seat - to Emotion and Melodrama". Which unfortunately today is rift within just about every individual news outlet in existence.
The Pulitzer's story has made me think of most movers and shakers as less than perfect and less than heroes and less than "flawless" sycophants - and as I read more and more towards the back of the book. I was certain of it. His obsession made him powerful and useful and earth shattering and a hero - but it also later in life mad him into his own "Darth Vader". Fighting against monsters eventually causes one to see everyone else as a monster. And it turned him into the very person, entity and/or Dragon - he initially was determined to bring down. Pulitzer became the DRAGON!
Before this revelation however it is true that for most of this book I was grabbed by the tale of a person who could have achieved so very much more than he did - had he refined himself - just a little - and/or listened to his wife and friends and coworkers.
Yet - I also found find that I wanted to get this work back into my hands and continue on down the road of Joseph Pulitzer and I took it with me everywhere - to read while waiting for a meeting, or sitting in the car waiting for my wife to shop or while up early in a hotel room while the rest of the family was asleep, and at my desk to read during a break. I wanted to know what happened next.
So - I was truly and fully, invested in this work and wanted to move along with the story, life tale and adventure as quickly as I could. A very good work, I commend the author - a personal life story I found engaging, interesting, informative, saddening and quite touching on all fronts. Good Job!
J. P. Ledbetter
Who is Joseph Pulitzer?
I only knew the name Pulitzer from the award given every year. Based on this part biography and part fictional novel I know a bit more about this Hungarian immigrant who came to America. Reading this novel reminded me of some of the other entrepreneurs like the Carnegie’s, Ford’s, Vanderbilt’s, Mellon’s, etc.. These men as well as Pulitzer all had that drive that made them the success’s that they all became. I really enjoyed this book and would recommend it to everyone.
-Grandpa Joe
I Want to Read More
Who Is Joseph Pulitzer? Now I know!
I've heard, of course, of the Pulitzer Prizes, but never knew anything about how they were created or by whom. When author Terrrence Crimmins contacted me about his fascinating novel Who Is Joseph Pulitzer and asked if I'd like to review it on Amazon, I gladly accepted. This is the kind of book I most enjoy.. It draws a compelling portrait of a historical figure I know little about and it inspires me with the courage and brilliance of a struggling, good-hearted person who changes the world for the better in many ways.
Pulitzer was a Jewish immigrant from Hungary who sought the promise of a better life in America when he was only 17 years old in the post-Civil War period. His first job in a newspaper was in St. Louis, Missouri where he was soon noted for his ambitious, innovative style of writing. Only a few years later he took over the Dispatch-Inquirer and the paper continued to increase its circulation, but his challenging of corruption infuriated some crooks and irritated St. Louis's high society he and his wife belonged to.
Finally they needed to leave for New York City where he purchased the overstately paper The World. With the sensationalist writing he had created in Missouri, he woke up the other newspaper editors to his dynamic presence. They hated him and his paper that could be enjoyed by the poor masses, especially. It wasn't too many months later that the World topped the papers in the booming city.
So this is a novel, part fiction and part fact, that, you could say, employs the same sensationalizing that Pulitzer used and demanded of his hundreds of writers. The book brings Pulitzer to glorious life with his character strengths and flaws. Crimmins presents his stalwart hero as a person we can believe really existed and in a style reminiscent of a courtroom thriller, in my estimation. As part of the jury I declare Pulitzer an outstanding citizen of the United States, innocent of the charge of treason by President Theodore Roosevelt in the early 1900s.
To further whet your appetite for discovering who the creator of sensationalism as well as the Pulitzer Prizes, I''ll offer a morsel from Pulitzer's defending speech in the Supreme Court trial,, officiated by Chief Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes:
““...No American is above the law, Your Honor, and it is very important that we have free speech and freedom of the press in order to restrain the power of the President. President (Theodore) Roosevelt wants to silence me, Your Honor, because he is ashamed of his actions, and if I were him, I, too, would be ashamed/'”
I also had a vague understanding of Roosevelt. Now I understand him a lot better. He may have been a conservationist and founded the national park service, I believe, but he was also a Republican with too many ugly similarities with Trump.
America needs such brave fighters for justice as Pulitzer. Now more than ever.
Thank you, Terrence. While there were numerous editing mistakes throughout the first three-fourths of your novel, I loved every minute I spent on it and am happy to highly recommend it.
The Beginning of Fake News
Throughout life, biographies have been my first choice in reading. I suppose I am a bit of a voyeur and am always amazed by what the subjects have accomplished. When I started this book about Pulitzer, I had no idea he was an immigrant, but I had heard of the Pulitzer Prize.
As I began to read, I could not believe he would become a major force in the newspaper business. His personality, I believed, would not be helpful in his endeavor. I was wrong. It and his great desire to help those on the bottom rung of life continually drove him. He had one fault; he had to be the best to the detriment of his marriage and his health.
The dialog the author provides puts the reader in the middle of the action. At times you sit on the sidelines and cheer him on, and at other times, you fear for him because you know where this will end.
If you want to know where “Fake News” probably started, do pick up this book. Today the news media is divisive and travels at lightning speed. Perhaps, In Pulitzer’s day, it was worse, but news traveled more slowly and was sold on corners by newsboys.
This is a book you must read. It is a story of how true grit and purpose in full overdrive can produce poor results for the one who strives to do good.
-Jan Peregrine
Thank you for taking the time to read this. Please follow the directions at the bottom as to whether you would like to recieve further once a month emails.
Personal Website Link
My Blog is available here
Facebook Page Link
Twitter Link
|
|
|
|
|