to clients about the effects of abortion, and gave false promises of help with housing and other needs. However, there are no requirements for abortion providers to inform women about the help available at pregnancy centers, or even to allow the woman to view the ultrasound of the baby. Pro-life centers are clearly being targeted. Centers which are not medical providers are also required to post large print notices stating that they are not licensed medical providers and include the statement in all advertising. Similar laws in other cities, such as Austin, TX, and New York City, have already been struck down as unconstitutional.
Since the passage of the law, four different pregnancy centers brought suits to protest the law, and request an injunction against enforcement until the case was resolved. At least some pregnancy centers have refused to comply, saying they would rather close than do so. The legal battle has continued with the support of Alliance Defending Freedom and the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA). In October of 2016, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the law. The 9th Circuit court is one of the most liberal - and most overturned - appeals court in the nation. On Nov 13, 2017, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case.
1.
http://www.lifenews.com/2016/10/14/appeals-court-upholds-california-law-forcing-pregnancy-centers-to-promote-abortions/
http://www.lifenews.com/2017/11/13/battle-to-stop-california-law-forcing-pregnancy-centers-to-promote-abortions-heads-to-supreme-court/